CLAT November 5 Daily Practice Questions with Answers

CLAT November 5 Daily Practice Questions with Answers

CLAT 2025 November 5 Daily Practice Questions with Answers: For the CLAT 2024 exam, the candidates should take these daily practice questions with answers for November 5. Topics covered the English language and current affairs, including general knowledge, quantitative techniques, and legal and logical reasoning. This sample practice will effectively help improve your time management, analytical thinking, and reading skills. Consistently working and analyzing the questions can boost their preparation for the upcoming exams.

Also Read | CLAT November 1 Daily Practice Questions with Answers

CLAT 2025 November 5 Daily Practice Questions with Answers: Legal Reasoning

Candidates can check out the CLAT 2025 November 5  Daily Practice Questions with Answers from the Legal Reasoning section:

Question 1: Assad buys an electoral bond worth ` 1,00,000/- on November 9, 2022 and plans to give the bond to the Popular People’s Party (the “PPP”), which he has been supporting for many years. On November 10, he must travel out of station on some urgent business, and he only hands the bond over to a representative of the PPP on November 14, 2022. The PPP’s representative deposits the bond in the Party’s account on November 16, 2022, but the bank refuses to credit the bond to the party’s account, on the grounds that it was no longer valid. Is the bank correct?

(A)   No, since Assad was a long-time supporter of the PPP.

(B)   Yes, since the bonds were only issued from November 9 to November 15, 2022 and were invalid after that.

(C)   Yes, since the party representative had not deposited the bond with an authorised branch of the bank.

(D)   No, since the bond was valid on November 16, 2022.

Answer: (B)

Question 2: Two days later, the police obtain an order from the Magistrate directing Bhargesh to provide them with his photographs. As Bhargesh continues to refuse to provide his photographs, a regular police constable forces him to stand still and takes his photographs. Bhargesh files a case in court, claiming that the constable’s actions violate the Act. Will he succeed?

(A)  Yes, since Bhargesh had been detained under a preventive section of the CrPC.

(B) Yes, since only police personnel of the rank of Head Constable or above can take measurements of any person who resists or refuses to give measurements when ordered to do so by a Magistrate.

(C)  No, the Magistrate had issued an order directing him to provide his photographs to the police.

(D)  No, since the police constable was only performing his duty.

Answer: (B)

Question 3: Bhargesh is later released by the police because they are unable to find enough evidence to make a strong case against him. On October 5, 2022, the police received a complaint alleging that  Bhargesh  had  beaten  up  his neighbour and caused the neighbour severe injuries. They ask the local Magistrate to issue an order directing Bhargesh to provide the police his blood samples, so that they can match them against some blood stains that were found on the neighbour’s clothes. The Magistrate issues the order,  but  Bhargesh  refuses to provide the blood samples. Is Bhargesh bound to provide his blood samples to the police under the Act?

(A)  Yes, since the crime that Bhargesh was accused of was very serious.

(B)  Yes, since the Magistrate had passed an order directing him to do so.

(C) Yes, since Bhargesh had already been arrested in connection with another crime in the past.

(D) Yes, since the police needed the blood samples to verify Bhargesh’s involvement in the crime.

Answer: (B)

Question 4: The police release Bhargesh, but to ensure that he does not disturb the public peace, they ask the Magistrate to issue an order under Section 117 of the CrPC, directing Bhargesh to provide a security of ` 1,00,000/- for his good behaviour and to ensure he maintains the peace, which the Magistrate refuses. The police now tell Bhargesh he must provide them with his iris and retina scans. Is Bhargesh required to do so?

(A)   No, since a person against whom an order has been issued under Section 117 of the CrPC cannot be made to give their measurements to the police.

(B)   Yes, since a person against whom an order has been issued under Section 117 of the CrPC can be made to give their measurements to the police.

(C)    Yes, since Bhargesh had been detained under other preventive Sections of the CrPC in the past.

(D)   No, since the Magistrate had not issued the order.

Answer: (D)

Question 5: Assume that in March 2021, the government changes Section 498A of the IPC. The effect of this change is that asking a married woman to do household chores — even for their own family — by herself would be considered cruelty, and therefore, an offence under the Section. Some days after this change comes into effect, Shamita, Ashima’s friend at work, tells her that her husband has been forcing her to do all the household work by herself. Ashima tells Shamita that her husband’s actions would amount to an offence under Section 498A of the IPC, even though Ashima herself has been unsuccessful in having Ashwin convicted under that Section in the past. Is Ashima’s advice to Shamita correct?

(A)  Yes, since Section 498A has now been changed, and Shamita’s husband’s actions would now be an offence under the changed Section 498A.

(B)   No, since Ashima has been unsuccessful in having Ashwin convicted under that Section in the past.

(C)  Yes, since the passing of the Protection of Married Women Act has resulted in Shamita’s husband’s actions being made illegal.

(D)  No, since Ashima is only Shamita’s friend, and only the married woman herself can file a complaint under Section 498A of the IPC.

Answer: (A)