CAT 2016 was held on 4th Dec 2016 at various cities across India for the first level of selection into IIMs and other B-schools. The test was conducted in two slots: Slot-I in the morning and Slot-II in the afternoon. Over 2 lakh candidates appeared for the CAT 2016 exam, which was conducted across 138 cities in India. IIM Bangalore was the Convener for CAT 2016. Many students maintained that CAT 2016 witnessed a shift from a conventional pattern paper to an analytical based paper.
There were 100 questions spread out in three sections:
· Section I: Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension has 34 Questions
· Section II: Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning has 32 Questions
· Section III: Quantitative Ability has 34 Questions
Each of these sections was independent of each other and was timed separately. Once a section ended, candidates could not go back to it.
Both Slot 1 and slot 2 of CAT 2016 did not throw many surprises this year. The numbers of non-MCQ questions were less than that of CAT 2015: except that there were not many differences between CAT 2015 and 2016.
- The pattern of VARC was exactly the same as that of CAT 2015
- DILR was also no different- but some questions were bit difficult. DILR reported to have been slightly more difficult in Slot-2 as compared to Slot 1.
- Quant, both in Slot 1 and 2, continued to be tricky.
What could have caused a problem for the CAT 2016 test takers is that some portions of the paper were illegible. There is a claim on social media that in the 1st slot of CAT 2016, there were 3 questions in Quant with an unrecognisable symbol. Later on, we got to know it was square root and one of the questions had no right answer.
An overall raw score of 160 plus should put a student in a comfortable position where (s)he can accept calls from a number of IIMs and other top B-schools. The overall structure of the CAT paper was as follows:
Section | No. of Questions | No. of MCQ Questions | Difficulty Level | Good Questions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension | 34 | 10 | Easy- Moderate | 25 - 26 |
Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning | 32 | 8 | Moderate - Difficult | 16 - 18 |
Quantitative Ability | 34 | 7 | Moderate - Difficult | 22 - 25 |
Total | 100 | 68 - 72 |
CAT 2016 Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC) Analysis
In both the slots, this section was very similar to that of CAT 2015 paper. RC passages were not difficult to read and the questions were between easy to moderate difficulty level. It appears that near abstract passages and hardcore implied questions of the 2015 CAT CAT is passé now. RC’s were majorly factual- neither lengthy nor abstract in nature. A careful reading of the Passages and correctly identifying the factual questions was the need of the hour. However, the options of some questions were close and, hence, tricky.
Time management was the key. There was a fewer number of inference based questions this time. There were total 5 passages - three passages (450 words each approximately) and two passages (350 words each). The three passages had 6 questions each and the other two had 3 questions each. The difficulty level of the passages was moderate.
The questions in Verbal Ability were non-MCQ type and did not carry any negative marking. These were Verbal Logic type and students must have practiced these well as these were present in Cat 2015 also. Para jumbles questions had 5 Sentence type and were non-MCQs: One should have attempted all. These were easy to solve with the mandatory pairs using pronouns and linking words in the sentences.
Summary questions had a small paragraph of about 150 words followed by four options. One had to simply type in the correct option number. Para-jumble (Odd sentence out) had 5 sentence paragraphs one of which was the odd sentence. Odd sentence was an easy locate using the thematic difference.
An attempt of 25-26 questions would be considered good in this section.
Area | Topic | No. of Questions |
---|---|---|
Reading Comprehension
(24 Questions) | Reading Comprehension | 24 |
Verbal Ability
(10 Questions) | Para-jumble, Summary & Para-jumble (Odd sentence out) | 4, 3 & 3 respectively |
Also Read: Slot 1 of CAT 2016 Analysis: QA Difficult, DILR Easy
CAT 2016 Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning (DILR) Analysis
In this section, three sets were easy and one had a moderate-difficulty level. Most of the DI sets were calculation heavy. Logical reasoning questions, on the other hand, were of easy to moderate level of difficulty. An attempt of 16 plus would be considered good in this section.
Section | Topic | No. of Questions |
---|---|---|
Data Interpretation | Four Sets: Moderate to Difficult | 4 questions each |
Logical Reasoning | Four sets of group questions were there. Topics included Coding Decoding, Set Theory , Scheduling Lectures and other arrangement questions: Moderate - Difficult | 4 questions each |
Also Read: Sections of CAT 2016 Paper Leaked! Know More Here!
CAT 2016 Quantitative Ability (QA) Analysis
QA had 34 questions in total, of which 7 Questions belonged to Non-MCQ type and the rest belonged to MCQs. The questions were mostly based on the fundamentals of QA. The topics covered were like Algebra, Geometry, Modern Math, Arithmetic and Number Systems.
Topic | No. of Questions |
---|---|
Number System | 3-4 |
Algebra | 8-10 |
Arithmetic | 9-10 |
Modern Math | 3-4 |
Geometry and Mensuration | 7-8 |
The difficulty level was marginally higher than CAT 2015. An attempt of 22-23 with 90% accuracy would be a good attempt.
Similar Articles
Total Seats in IIMs: Category-wise IIM Seats & Distribution
List of Top 10 MBA Specialisations in 2024: Choose the Best One
CAT 2024 Reservation Policy for OBC, SC, ST, EWS, PwD at IIMs
NMAT TAPMI Cutoff 2024: Expected & Previous Year Cutoff
What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Taking an Online CAT Mock on a Daily Basis?
CAT 2024 Exam Day Instructions - Rules, What to Carry, Do's and Don'ts