CLAT 2025 October 26 Daily Practice Questions with Answers

CLAT 2025 October 26 Daily Practice Questions with Answers

CLAT 2025 October 26 Daily Practice Questions with Answers: For the CLAT 2024 exam, the candidates should take these daily practice questions with answers for October 26. Topics covered the English language and current affairs, including general knowledge, quantitative techniques, and legal and logical reasoning. This sample practice will effectively help improve your time management, analytical thinking, and reading skills. Consistently working and analyzing the questions can boost their preparation for the upcoming exams.

Also Read | CLAT 2025 October 25 Daily Practice Questions with Answers

CLAT 2025 October 26 Daily Practice Questions with Answers: Legal Reasoning

Candidates can check out the CLAT 2025 October 27 Daily Practice Questions with Answers from Legal Reasoning section:

Question 1: In April 2020, Ashwin’s friend Rakesh visits Ashwin and  Ashima’s  home,  and stays with them for a few days. During his visit, he is very mean to Ashima, and uses abusive language with her. He also threw a plate at her one evening when he was unhappy with the meal that she had prepared. Ashima now claims that Rakesh has committed an offence under Section 498A of the IPC. Is she likely to succeed?

(A) No, since Rakesh’s actions were perfectly justifiable for a man who does not get a well-cooked meal.

(B) Yes, since Rakesh’s use of abusive language and throwing the plate at Ashima clearly amount to cruelty.

(C) No, since Rakesh is not her husband, nor is he related to Ashwin.

(D) Yes, since Rakesh was staying at Ashwin and Ashima’s home at the time of the incident.

Answer: (C)

Question 2: Frustrated and upset with her marriage, Ashima applies for and is granted a divorce from Ashwin in November 2020. Since she and Ashwin had been friends for many years before they got married, she stays in touch with him. She moves into her own apartment and starts going to office regularly at a new job. Ashwin is very upset at this and starts treating Ashima very cruelly. Ashima again claims that Ashwin has committed an offence under Section 498A of the IPC. Is she right?

(A) Yes, since Ashwin has, as we are told, treated her cruelly.

(B) Yes, since Ashwin has been her husband.

(C) No, since Ashwin was understandably upset at Ashima’s behaviour.

(D) No, since she is no longer married to Ashwin.

Answer: (D)

Question 3: On October 15, 2022, the police detain Bhargesh under a preventive Section of the CrPC, since they believe that he had plans to disturb the public peace during a festival day. They then tell Bhargesh that he must provide his measurements to them for their records. Bhargesh refuses again. Is Bhargesh bound to provide his photographs to the police under the Act?

(A) No, since he was not charged or under arrest in connection with any other offence at the time.

(B) No, since that would violate Bhargesh’s right to privacy.

(C) Yes, since the police had detained Bhargesh under a preventive Section of the CrPC.

(D) Yes, since there was a high likelihood that Bhargesh would disturb the public peace on a festival day

Answer: (C)

Question 4: Ashwin and Ashima were married in February 2020. In March 2020, Ashwin asked Ashima to take care of all their household work, such as cooking, cleaning, and other domestic chores, as he was very busy with his professional responsibilities. Ashima claims that this amounts to treating her like a maid servant and constitutes an offence under Section 498A of the IPC. Applying the Bombay High Court decision, is she likely to succeed?

(A)  Yes, since Ashwin had only asked Ashima to do their household work, and not for others.

(B)  No, since Ashwin had only asked Ashima to do their household work, and not for others.

(C) Yes, since Ashwin had asked Ashima to do household work for themselves as well as others.

(D)  No, since treating a married woman like a maid servant would not amount to an offence under that Section.

Answer: (B)

Question 5: Bhargesh is arrested by the police on April 11, 2022, on suspicion of having committed a series of minor thefts. During their investigation, the police find some fingerprints at the crime scenes, and on April 12, 2022, they tell Bhargesh that he must provide his finger-impressions to them so that they can check whether they match the fingerprints from the crime scenes. When Bhargesh refuses, the police tell him  that he has no choice but to provide his measurements, as the Act had been passed by Parliament the previous month. Was Bhargesh bound to provide his finger-impressions under the Act?

(A) No, since Bhargesh had only been arrested, and not convicted.

(B) Yes, since Bhargesh was under arrest.

(C) No, since the Rules had not yet been notified.

(D) Yes, since finger-impressions are included within the definition of “measurements” under the Act

Answer: (D)