Here's How Students Reacted on CLAT 2017

Common Law Admission Test or CLAT 2017 took place successfully on May 14, 2017. Chanakya National Law University conducted CLAT 2017 examination this year. The CLAT 2017 examination started at 3:00 PM and continued until 5:00 PM. CLAT 2017 examination took place in 63 cities across the country. According to sources, here's how the students reacted:

Response of Students on CLAT UG 2017 Question Paper: -

The CLAT UG 2017 examination had 200 multiple choice questions. The question paper had questions from various subjects like Logical Reasoning, Legal Aptitude, Elementary Mathematics, Current Affairs, General Knowledge and English. Most of the students who took CLAT UG 2017 examination were of the opinion that the difficulty level was moderate.

One of the students mentioned that the exam was fair. However, some questions were difficult and others were straightforward. He further said that CLAT UG 2017 examination was easier than the 2016 examination. Giving details about the section wise difficulty level, he said that Logic Reasoning and Mathematics were difficult. All the other sections were easy.

Also read: - Estimate Your CLAT 2017 Score through our Rank Predictor, Click Here

Another student said that Mathematics and Logic Reasoning sections were average, and others were fine. Only those students who practised well might have done well in Mathematics and Logical Reasoning, he added.

Another student revealed that there were more questions on current affairs this year. Overall 80% of the paper was easy while 20% was difficult. Some students felt that Mathematics was lengthy and questions from Logical Reasoning were tricky.

Also read: - Difference between AILET, LSAT and CLAT

Response of Students on CLAT LLM 2017 Question Paper: -

Most of the students who took CLAT 2017 examination for the admission to LLM course felt that the paper was difficult. Compared to the previous year, the question paper was difficult this year.

One of the students said that only those candidates who prepared for the examination might have done well. Students with average preparation might not do well in the examination. The difficulty level was high.

Another student mentioned that the question paper was not lengthy, and she was able to answer all the questions. However, the difficulty level was moderate. The questions in Constitutional Law section were very easy.

Other said that they did not do well in the examination due to lack of enough preparation.