IIFT 2019 Exam Analysis
Here's a detailed analysis of the IIFT 2019 exam to get an insight into the section-wise as well as the overall difficulty level of the paper. Not only this, you will be given complete information on the no. of questions asked in every section as well topics under each section.
As per experts at Career Launcher, there were no surprise elements in the different sections of the paper but the overall paper turned out to be tougher as compared to the last year's paper. The paper was quite lengthy and some of the questions were very tricky.
The General Awareness (GA) section was on similar lines as last year in terms of difficulty level so the cut-off is expected to remain the same. English Usage (EU) and Reading Comprehension (RC) turned out to be tougher than last year's exam so the cut-off could go down by 1 mark. Attempting 4 passages would be considered a good performance in Reading Comprehension (RC).
The difficulty level of Quantitative Ability (QA) was also higher so the cut-off in this section could also go down by 1 mark. Logical Reasoning (LR) section turned out to be the hardest section and the difficulty level was higher in comparison with the previous year's exam. The cut-off for LR is expected to go down by 2 marks.
Out of all the sections, Data Interpretation (DI) turned out to be the easiest so the cut-off in this section is expeted to increase by 1 mark.
A total of 114 questions were asked in the 6 sections and every section had a different weightage. Check out the overall structure of the exam.
Section | No. of Questions | Marks Allotted per Question | Negative Marks Allotted per Question | Total Marks | Good Attempts | Idea Time | Sectional Cut-off |
---|
Data Interpretation | 20 | 1 | 0.17 | 20 | 4 | 10 mins | 0.75 |
Logical Reasoning | 20 | 1 | 0.25 | 20 | 10 | 35 mins | 4-4.5 |
General Awareness | 18 | 0.5 | 0.33 | 9 | 8 | 10 mins | 0.83-1 |
Reading Comprehension | 16 | 1 | 0.33 | 16 | 9-10 | 25 mins | 2.5-2.75 |
Verbal Ability | 20 | 0.75 | 0.33 | 15 | 11-12 | 12 mins | 3.25-3.5 |
Quantitative Aptitude | 20 | 1 | 0.33 | 20 | 10-11 | 30 mins | 3-3.25 |
Section-wise Analysis of the IIFT 2019 Entrance Exam
Data Interpretation
Overall, this section was the easiest. An attempt of 4-5 questions would be considered very good. To sail through the cut-off, an attempt of just about 2-3 with 100% accuracy would be decent.
Topics | No. of Questions | Doable Questions | Difficulty Level |
---|
Mixed Graphs | 12 | 3 | Tough |
Tables | 8 | 2 | Tough |
Logical Reasoning
This section turned out to be quite time-consuming. Attempting around 10-11 questions with 85% accuracy would be considered good in this section.
Topic | No. of Questions | Doable Questions | Difficulty Level |
---|
Distribution | 4 | 3 | Easy to Medium |
Matrix | 4 | 4 | Easy |
Venn-diagram | 2 | 1 | Medium |
Input Output | 2 | 1 | Medium |
Missing number | 1 | 1 | Easy to Medium |
Arrangement | 4 | 2 | Medium to Tough |
Selection | 3 | 1 | Medium |
General Awareness
This section was easier as compared to last year. Sailing though the cut-off would be easy with an attempt of 8 questions with 50% accuracy.
Topic | No. of Questions | Doable Questions | Difficulty Level |
---|
Current Affairs | 2 | 2 | Easy |
Business and Economy | 10 | 3-4 | Medium to Tough |
Miscellaneous | 1 | 1 | Easy |
Geography | 2 | - | Tough |
Science | 1 | - | Tough |
Sports | 1 | 1 | Easy |
Books | 1 | 1 | Easy |
Reading Comprehension
Tackling this section would've been easy for anyone with a good reading habit. Otherwise, this section was quite time-consuming.
Passages | No. of Questions | Doable Questions | Difficulty Level |
---|
Culture | 3 | 2 | Moderate |
Public Intellectuals | 3 | 2 | Tough |
Information flow | 4 | 2 | Tough |
Liberal Arts Education | 3 | 1-2 | Tough |
GDP | 3 | 2 | Moderate |
Verbal Ability
Overall, this section was tough. Some of the questions looked more like GK-based rather than English language-based. The questions based on para-jumble, fill in the blank, and grammar were easy.
Topic | No. of Questions | Doable Questions | Difficulty Level |
---|
Jumble words | 3 | 1 | Tough |
Analogy | 2 | 0-1 | Tough |
Fill in the blanks (2 blanks) | 3 | 2-3 | Easy |
Match the column | 2 | 1-2 | Medium |
Spot the error | 2 | 2 | Easy |
Word Roots | 4 | 1 | Medium to Tough |
Sentence Improvement | 2 | 2 | Easy |
Para Jumble (4 sentence) | 2 | 2 | Easy |
Quantitative Ability
As compared to other entrance exams, the weightage given to Geometry and Modern Math was higher in this paper. An attmept of 10-12 questions with about 85% accuracy would be considered decent in this section.
Topic | No. of Questions | Doable Questions | Difficulty Level |
---|
Arithmetic | 5 | 3 | Medium |
Algebra | 7 | 4 | Easy to Medium |
Geometry & Mensuration | 5 | 2 | Medium |
P&C, Probability & Set Theory | 3 | 2 | Easy to Medium |
For General category candidates, an overall score of 31-33 should be enough to sail through the cut-off. For NC/OBC category candidates, an overall score of 26-28 should be sufficient whereas 23-24 marks should be enough for SC/ST/PwD category candidates.
With inputs from Career Launcher
Disclaimer: The analysis provided above is based on various sources and therefore is totally indicative in nature. Students are recommended to wait for their actual results before taking any decision.